Tagged: 30 day book challenge

Day 06- A book that makes you sad

… but in a nice way.

Header2

This post is part of a month-long series of pre-dated posts running while I am on holiday. Feel free to comment, I’ll get back to you when I return!
Please note that any “reviews” I write here are simply my own opinion and that I am not doing any objective, informative reviews for this challenge. If there are any spoilers in a post, I will indicate it at the top.
I draw the book covers straight from Goodreads and you can click on the images to go to the book’s page on there.

 

 Airman, by Eoin Colfer.

 

I have cried over several books. The ending of Lord of the Rings leaves me in tears every time, even though I can basically quote it by now. I’m generally not someone who cries over stories, but I have cried over several books, especially at the painful deaths of beloved characters (Harry Potter, I’m looking at you). Also, I am a sucker for a character who sacrifices him or herself in favour of his or her friends.

 

However, I am only going to mention one book now: Airman, by Eoin Colfer. I consider this to be one of the saddest books that I own, sadder even that those set in the terrible conditions of war, or Dystopian novels. Maybe this is because Airman is not a fantasy or a Dystopian novel, but a historical one. Even though there is fantasy inside the historical facts, the dark setting and the absence of light or hope, both of which are so common as symbols in other fantasy novels, makes this one of the saddest books I have ever read. As for Dystopian novels, I do not really find them sad, exactly because they are hypothetical in nature.

 

Airman… right. This book was written by Eoin Colfer, who is more well-known for his Artemis Fowl series of books. It is set in Ireland, in the late days of Queen Victoria’s reign – at the end of the nineteenth century. The race for flight is on. From a modern perspective, we all of course know that the Wright-brothers won this race, but this does not prevent Colfer from inventing a pair of fictional characters to participate in this race… and maybe even win it. Who knows, when all parties concerned where so close to inventing the aeroplane, who was actually the first?

The story follows the life of Conor Broekhart, who had a connection to the sky from the moment he was born – literally. By the time he was nine, he proved his talent for invention and displayed his dream of the sky. By the time he was fourteen, he was cruelly betrayed and forsaken by friends, family and kingdom and thrown into the bleakest, dankest hole they could find. But Conor would fly. Not even the stones over his head would be able to hold this young man down.

 

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return.

- Leonardo Da Vinci

 

Let us face it: it sounds inspiring and uplifting when summarised like above. But this book is bleak, shorn of the usual adornment, though it is extremely powerful. Colfer’s characteristic style is as visible in this book as in his more popular ones. My lecturers are always telling me that I am supposed to be able to recognise Dickens’s or Lawrence’s style at a mile away, but I’m still not seeing it. However, I can certainly recognise Eoin Colfer’s style at a mile away. Winking smile It is dense and fast: he does not waste words. It is not only the flying in this book that leaves me breathless – I’ve thought he was an amazing writer ever since I first read his work.

 

I love Airman, even though it makes me so sad. I experience the betrayal scene as so powerful and so painful that I often skip this chapter when I reread this book. I’ve reread it several times. However, I am still not quite sure what the redeeming quality of Airman is, for it is generally well-thought of, as can be seen by its exceptionally high average rating on Goodreads. I have not seen many books on there receive 4 out of 5 average rating: most settle for about 3 point something. Usually one would have thought that a book as depressing as this would receive bad ratings. Is it in the ultimately inspiring nature? Is it in the attraction that bleakness and hopelessness have to many readers (including myself)? Is it in the historical details about the race for flight? Or even the dream of flight?

 

I confess that I do not know. I love historical novels. I have an unhealthy attraction for depressing books. I love how Colfer includes and plays with the history of flight. I love Airman to bits, even though it makes me cry.

Other men look up and down, left and right; but men like us are different. We are visionaries.

- Linus Wynter
Airman

Conor Broekhart is Airman.

 

Tomorrow I’ll post about a book I think is underrated.

Sig3

Day 03 – Your favourite series

Header2

This post is part of a month-long series of pre-dated posts running while I am on holiday. Feel free to comment, I’ll get back to you when I return!
Please note that any “reviews” I write here are simply my own opinion and that I am not doing any objective, informative reviews for this challenge. If there are any spoilers in a post, I will indicate it at the top.
I draw the book covers straight from Goodreads and you can click on the images to go to the book’s page on there.

IMG_3849

* A slightly outdated picture of my Discworld collection. *

My favourite series in the entire world is Discworld by Sir Terry Pratchett. I’m going here just on series, not trilogies or anything else that authors have invented by now. If I don’t we’ll be here till Tuesday. Another contender for this prestigious honour (hah!) was the Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling, but if I was ever forced to choose between the two, I would have to choose the Discworld. It’s longer and more all-encompassing for one thing and more interesting to talk about. Young Adult is not my favourite genre either, whereas satire is. My own writing is quite a lot of satire. In short, I love satire. But I still love Harry Potter, don’t worry. Smile with tongue out

At 39 books and counting, the Discworld is one of the longest series that I have ever encountered. I haven’t read all of the books, but I’ve read just over half (23, I think). And I’ve read most of the later ones. It’s of the earlier ones that my knowledge kind of lacks. I dream of one day owning and having read the entire series. Nerd smile

The series is all set on a flat world, a disc not unlike that believed in by the peoples of the Ancient World, that rests on the back of four giant elephants that in turn stands on the back of a giant turtle, Great A’Tuin, that swims through space. There used to be a fifth elephant, but it fell off. If you find yourself rolling your eyes and thinking that this is not possible, I suggest you stop reading right now. Discworld is all about moving borders, about asking “what if?” and “what is possible?”.

 

What do I love about Discworld? Well, it is funny, but it is more than that. On the back covers of the paperback editions, they always call it “very close to the knuckleduster” and I consider this a very good description of the character of the books. Which is probably why that quote is on most of the covers in the first place, silly. Pratchett does more than crack jokes and make characters do and say embarrassing things. That is simply comedy or farce. He does all this anyway, usually, but underneath all of that lies a piece of social commentary for all who cares to stop and notice it. Underneath a lot of the jokes lies a lot of pain. As I read the books, I often get the idea that Pratchett cares intensely about people. He cares about people in all of their shapes and forms. There does not seem to be not a character that he cannot redeem in some small way. Even if a character does intensely evil things, he has a way of providing a legitimate reason for that person’s behaviour. Even if you cannot possibly agree with that person’s viewpoint, the reasoning behind it redeems him or her in some small way. Pratchett does not approach a story simply from the viewpoint of the hero, but also from that of the villain. Why do people act in the way that they do? After all, all people think in their own minds that they are in the right.

The earlier Discworld books are mostly pure comedy. There are jokes that are actually funny, there are a lot of puns. But already he is starting to question things. Like, what happens when the hero of the fairy tale/fantasy ages? He cannot remain young and limber forever. He is also going to get arthritis and a bad back. He is also going to grow too weak to heft a sword and no one is going to believe him when he declares who he is/was, because they think he should be young forever. The normal fantasy staples never touch this kind of ground. You are not supposed to think beyond the happy ending. Pratchett always does.

 

In my opinion, the first hint we get of what Discworld is going to become is in the third book Equal Rites, which deals with discrimination on base of gender. However, the series is still in its baby shoes here. Quite a large part of the series will grow to deal with discrimination later. I think Pratchett has a thing for it, because he will touch sexual orientation, racism, classism and gender discrimination. He especially likes giving a voice to the marginalised and the voiceless.

 

As the series grows, we also get to see the growth of Pratchett’s invented world. At first, it is sketchy. The description that Pratchett uses of an unsolved crime in Thud! works really well here as well. He speaks of it as a jigsaw puzzle: there are some corners and pieces of the edge, but the rest is a whole lot of sky. We get live through the Discworld’s invention of newspapers, a telegram-like system, football, films, music, stamps, paper money… and so on. By the later books, the picture of the history (strongly resembling that of Earth), geography (also strangely resembling Earth) and social problems (also painfully familiar) is so intricate that Discworld feels real. I feel as though I know it, like I know my own world. I feel as if I can picture Ankh-Morpork, Pratchett’s famous city, street for street and that is not something that happens often.

 

However, my favourite part of Discworld remains the social commentary underneath all the jokes and satire of regular fantasy and fairy tales. Especially the way that Pratchett deals with racism lies very close to my heart. Actually, he calls it “speciesism”, because people on the Disc do not discriminate on the basis of skin colour, but on the basis of species. “Black and white lived in perfect harmony and ganged up on green.”* Humans, pixies (pictsies), gnomes, goblins, trolls, dwarves, vampires, werewolves and zombies all make an appearance and are dealt with an refreshingly different approach from most fantasy. However, nevermind what anyone is called or what shape they are, you can always recognise our own world and its situations underneath it.

 

And that is the greatest glory of the Discworld: because it is familiar, laughter becomes a weapon. If that is not the goal of satire, I don’t know what is. If books and stories cannot point out wrongs and criticise, I don’t know what is going to become of society.

 

Check back tomorrow for my fave book of my favourite series! Smile

Sig3

*From Witches Abroad.

Day 01 – Best book you read last year

Header2This post is part of a month-long series of pre-dated posts running while I am on holiday. Feel free to comment, I’ll get back to you when I return!
Please note that any “reviews” I write here are simply my own opinion and that I am not doing any objective, informative reviews for this challenge. If there are any spoilers in a post, I will indicate it at the top.
I draw the book covers straight from Goodreads and you can click on the images to go to the book’s page on there.

 

Welcome to the first day of the book challenge, me! And readers, of course! Smile with tongue out

My, oh my, why did I not Goodreads at this time last year? Then it would have been so easy to just check up my timeline to see what I read when. Now… I’m having to think so hard about what I read for the first time last year.

Last year was 2011, right? And 2011 was the year that I took extra subjects. Well, more extra subjects than normal, that is. This meant that I had no time for reading anything that was not a prescribed book. I am not going to talk about prescribed books today, because I did not choose them. Usually they are not too bad – though some have really rubbed me up the wrong way – but hardly any have blown me away. Anyway, what I meant to say was that I did not actually read anything much last year. Except for rereading Discworld-novels – they are my comfort read, as you’ll come to notice more and more during this challenge. (And one of my obsessions as well.) So what did I read last year that was the best? Two books (I cannot choose):

The Final Empire by Brandon Sanderson,

Snuff by Terry Pratchett.

 

I think I’m cheating slightly on that first one. I started reading it at the end of 2010 and I do believe that it was the book that I read midnight on New Year. That’s part of a little tradition me, myself and I have. I always stay awake in bed reading, waiting for the new year to strike and then when it comes I switch off the light and go to sleep. I know, I am so boring. Therefore, I believe I finished The Final Empire in 2011. I hope so, or the very first post for this challenge is going to be dishonest already.

 

This book truly blew me away. I loved it and (I know it’s a horrible cliché) I really could not put it down. If I had to go to dinner, I put it down slowly and reluctantly, sulked through dinner, and hurried back as fast as I can to be absorbed back into the book. This book does not hang around – it moves. It’s vivid, not ripped off other fantasy writers and I love Brandon Sanderson’s writing style. (That he is also a NaNoWriMo writer may contribute to my fangirling over him.) I actually bought the other two books in this trilogy and they have been sitting on my shelves for a looooong time. (Darn in, university, will you never allow me time to read my own stuff?!) I’m too scared to begin them, because I suspect that they will grip me just like the first one and then I will again spend days on end reading and never get to doing my homework. I cannot afford to let this happen at the moment. Or any moment, really.

The Final Empire starts with a question that can turn the fantasy genre on its head: what if the Dark Lord won? Right, so that’s what happens in the prologue (and on the cover). Then we fast forward to see what happens in a world where the hero did not succeed in his million-to-one chance. It features a country where ash has fallen from the sky for a thousand years – the amount of time that the Lord Ruler has been in power. During his reign, the largest part of the population, the skaa, has been oppressed. But a revolution is rising and the ones in power had better watch out because they are not the only ones to possess magic, as they once thought. The Final Empire features a system of magic completely unique in my fantasy-reading experience: to do magic you need to “burn” certain metals in your stomach. Only certain people possess this power. But why is the Lord Ruler so much more powerful than anyone else?

 

Well, let’s talk about Snuff.

Obviously, I could not resist a new Terry Pratchett book when it came out. Even though it was exams, NaNoWriMo and my birthday all at once during the time it came out, I had to go look for it. I bought it (First edition hardcover of course. Discworld-books as some of the very few I’m prepared to splash out on – I reread them so much it that they need it!). It sat on my shelf like a shiny golden lure to get me through the month of November 2011. Ah, that glorious moment when I first got to open it! And now I’ll be honest: it did not blow me away the first time. Actually it confused me a bit and left me hanging. I think this was mostly due to the fact that I had not read Thud! before this time and Snuff is built heavily on it, so I missed some background. Another reason I think I was a bit disappointed is that I was so excited at reading a new Pratchett that I was going miles too fast through it and I missed details.

But then…

I reread it. And I fell in love. This time round it made sense. This time round the details clicked into place. This time round I read Thud! first. Now I can honestly give it 5 stars. It deals with a subject very close to my heart (like most of the sub-series of City Watch-books): discrimination and racism. Obviously the central character is Commander Vimes of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch. I was also very sad to learn later that this will be the last Watch-book that Pratchett will be writing. They’re my favourites *sniff* and there will never be a new one. *sniff* But I understand why he made this choice. With his illness, I can understand that he will want to end at a sensible point and not leave us hanging with Vimes’s story. And I’m happy he gave Vimes a happy ending. He deserves it.

And now I’m out of things to say about Snuff. I love it, but it being still relatively new, I’m afraid of giving away spoilers. But I can say that it contains a lot of poultry, the fresh air of the countryside and goblins. Also, it finally develops the character of Vimes’s little boy, Young Sam. A lovely character, with some strange interests. For long time Discworld fans, it also has the answers about Nobby Nobbs. All those questions that we’ve had about him since the first book are answered in Snuff.

Here are a couple of links to reviews from people better at it than me. Please note that they may contain spoilers:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/21/snuff-terry-pratchett-review?intcmp=239

http://www.burnbright.com.au/jamie-reviews-terry-pratchetts-snuff/

 

Check back tomorrow for day two – a book I’ve read more than three times!

Sig3